While compiling research for an article about independent Baptists, I came to realize that there would be far fewer independents if J. Frank Norris had been as successful as his spiritual heirs have been.
The independent Baptist movement was a direct outgrowth of the fundamentalist movement, which flowered in the early twentieth century in response to liberalizing tendencies among Protestants who accepted the findings of critical Bible study and broadened their theology to make room for modern scientific discoveries.
The publication and widespread distribution of a dozen slim paperbacks called The Fundamentals: a Testimony to the Truth spurred the development of a fundamentalist effort to take over both the Northern and Southern Baptist Conventions.
Neither convention succumbed to fundamentalist control, leading many to defect and set up independent associations, most of which splintered even further.
A prime mover in both the north and the south was the crusading Norris, who edited The Baptist Standard before selling his interest to become pastor of the First Baptist Church in Forth Worth. Texas. For a while, he served simultaneously as pastor of the Temple Baptist Church in Detroit.
Northern fundamentalists held rallies prior to the annual conventions in an effort to drum up support for their agenda, but failed to gain control. In 1922, the Northern Baptist Convention voted to affirm the New Testament, and nothing else, as its confession of faith.
Fundamentalist pressure was more successful among Southern Baptists, who voted in 1925 to adopt its first "Baptist Faith and Message," a version of the New Hampshire Confession of Faith that had been tweaked to express anti-evolutionary sentiments.
Southern Baptists did not surrender control of the convention to fundamentalist leaders, however. Norris' volatile temper and bizarre behavior (which included shooting an unarmed man to death in his office) led to the ouster of his Fort Worth church from its local association and the Baptist General Convention of Texas.
Facing increasing ostracism in the SBC, Norris started the Premillennial Baptist Missionary Fellowship in 1934. The movement grew, and in 1938 changed its name to the World Fundamental Baptist Missionary Fellowship. Norris’ incendiary actions, such as personally taking over the group’s Baptist Bible Seminary, spawned a mass defection of participants who started Baptist Bible Fellowship International (BBFI) in 1950.
The BBFI quickly started the Baptist Bible College in Springfield, Missouri. The college’s best-known alumnus has been Jerry Falwell, who founded Thomas Road Baptist Church and Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia.
By the time Falwell had founded the Moral Majority and reached the height of his influence, ultra-conservative Baptists led by fiery Texans had managed to do what Norris and the fundamentalists of the 1920's were unable to do. Using tactics not unlike their predecessors -- such as championing biblical inerrancy, demonizing opponents, and utilizing the pre-convention pastor's conference to rally support for a housecleaning agenda -- fundamentalist strategists gained complete control of the Southern Baptist Convention and systematically remade it in their own image.
The transformation was so wholesale that Falwell, the nation's leading independent Baptist, led his church in 1996 to add the SBC to its collection of alignments with independent groups like the Baptist Bible Fellowship International and the Southwide Baptist Fellowship.
This time around, the ostracized folk who felt led to move on were the outnumbered moderates, many of whom found new homes in the emerging Southern Baptist Alliance (now the Alliance of Baptists) and the more mainstream Cooperative Baptist Fellowship.
J. Frank Norris would be proud.

13 comments:
Tony:
Couple sincere questions here:
Have you read Barry Hankins Uneasy in Babylon and What do you make of Garry Wills recent analysis in his concluding chapters In American Christianities.
I think I have mentioned it before; but do google up Luc Sante's Museum of God and Museum of Crime.
If you can stomach it, I would be honored if maybe on a good day next spring you could indulge me an hour with Glen Jonas to talk about Truett and some of this.
Norris always fascinates. It never ends.
No Steve, I haven't read either of your references nor googled the museums of God or crime.
Frankly, I have many other things to do that have to take precedence over trying to keep up with the widespread and sometimes esoteric reading and surfing that you obviously enjoy.
Tony,
You said,
"This time around, the ostracized folk who felt led to move on were the outnumbered moderates, many of whom found new homes in the emerging Southern Baptist Alliance (now the Alliance of Baptists) and the more mainstream Cooperative Baptist Fellowship."
The Alliance of Baptists several years ago made an open endorsement of homosexuality. Thus they exposed their true theological character.
That you, and others on the Baptist left, continue to refer to these people as "moderates" would be laughable were the matter not so bitterly wicked.
If the Southern Baptists had paid more mind to the fundamentalists in the early 20th century, and to the Landmarkers before them, they might have been spared the decades of spiritual devestation wreaked on them by the plague of modernism.
Only eternity will tell the ruined churches and ruined lives that this theological leprosy has visited on the Baptist people, yeah, on all of western society!
Mark Osgatharp
Wynne, Arkansas
Tony,
A couple of comments:
Your thoughts on the continued popularity of the Falwell name as noted in a recent BP article.
Conventional Wisdom might suggest that a program/institution founded or built up around such a cult of personality could face an unsure future following the leaving/passing of its founder. But, because the heir is the son, might such a legacy be sustained?
This, in my mind, also speaks to other established churches who find themselves in the interim following a long-tenured pastor.
Also, ever notice that Independent Churches might not always be so independent? There are a few such churches in my area (probably due to the presence of a Bible College) and several have identical signage reading: "Independent Fundamental Bible-Believing."
Unless, by "independent," they mean "autonomous."(Which would be spelled out in the word Baptist).
Looking forward to your article on Independent Baptists.
Blessings to you and yours.
Dave
I would not want to live in a world where intelligent, open and civil discussion can be used to work out differences among individuals. I do not want to be strong armed into doing something someone else's way, nor do I want to follow a man whose lack of civility leads him to shoot and kill an unarmed man.
Homosexuality is but one sin among many. I will not condem another's sin lest I be judged for my own sins, that is God's domain. I will try to point them to the truth as the Bible reveals it, and let the Lord do the convicting. It amazes me how quick many are to point out homosexuality as seemingly the one and only sin while never mentioning obesity, adultry, gambling, drinking (to excess), and another biggie - dancing.
I will continue to worship with others of a like mind, and pray the Lord leads me in the right direction for myself to do His will, in His way, and that I can do it with the Spirit of Love, not bitterness and condemnation.
Well, leave it to me to not read my post before submitting it!
In the first line I meant to say, "I do not want to live in a world where ........cannot be used to work out our differences.
Oh, well, might as well make my usual first impression.
Paul
Did anybody read the NYT article entitled "The Evangelical Crackup" in the 10/29 list of articles at Baptists Today? J. Frank Norris would be proud now, but, in many ways, the influence of fundamentalism shows some signs of waning.
Mark said:
"Only eternity will tell the ruined churches and ruined lives that this theological leprosy has visited on the Baptist people, yeah, on all of western society!"
It's amazing to me that even though "only eternity will tell", you seem to be saying as much as you can.
It's also amazing that anyone who holds a different opinion than you must not believe the bible (going back to a statement that "The Bible doesn't carry much weight around here.")
I, personally, am glad that some of my Baptist peers did not listen to the fundamentalist movement. I grew up in such an environment and I saw the rhetoric of fundamentalism used for numerous non-Biblical purposed and abused under the banner that "if you don't agree with me, then you must not believe the Bible."
Perhaps I paint fundamentalists with a broad brush because of the experience that I had. Maybe the same applies to your view of moderates...
Paul McCurry,
You said,
"It amazes me how quick many are to point out homosexuality as seemingly the one and only sin while never mentioning obesity, adultry, gambling, drinking (to excess), and another biggie - dancing."
I did not mention homosexuality because I think it is "the one and only sin". I mentioned it because it is the pet sin of the theological left which they are intent on sanctifying. If they were trying to justify the sins of adultery, gambling or drunkeness, I could have mentioned those sins as well (I've yet to discover that sin of "obesity" in the Scriptures - but I guess you meant gluttonly).
The Alliance of Baptists insist they are "moderate" in their theology and yet they have openly endorsed the sin of homosexuality, declaring it not to be a sin at all. The fact that they have endorsed this sin shows that they really are on the theological left, yeah, over the edge.
This goes to show that when the fundamentalists of the early 20th century, and the Landmarkers before them, warned of incipient modernist within Baptist ranks, they were absolutely right.
Mark Osgatharp
Wynne, Arkansas
John P.,
You said,
"It's amazing to me that even though 'only eternity will tell', you seem to be saying as much as you can."
I am telling as much as I can, but I'm sure it doesn't scratch the surface of what actually is. But it will all be revealed in that day when the Lord will judge the secrets of men's hearts, and reward every man according to his work.
There are some of us still believe in the Bible and therefore still believe that Jesus and the prophets did not err when they foretold that awful event.
You said,
"It's also amazing that anyone who holds a different opinion than you must not believe the bible (going back to a statement that "The Bible doesn't carry much weight around here.")"
To which I respond:
A. I do not say that a man who holds a different opinion than me does not believe the Bible.
B. What I do say is that a man who admits he does not believe the Bible do not believe the Bible. Those on the theological left openly proclaim that they do not believe the Bible is totally accurate in its theological assertions.
They may assent to some things that the Bible asserts, but they vehemently defend their right to disbelieve any assertion in the Bible they don't like.
So they believe some things the Bible says and they don't believe some things the Bible says. Therefore they view the Bible the same way they view most every religious writing in the world, including the writings of the fundamentalists they so bitterly hate.
Mark Osgatharp
Wynne, Arkansas
Osgatharp:
Don't want to get in too much of a debate with you, cause like Bob JOnes the founder of the school, you pretty much got your mind made up.
Let me know if you ever get a chance to read STricklin's book, Geneaology of Dissent.
Strong testimonies there by Progressive Baptist lives, their witness.
I always thought Stewart Newman had a good joke about your kind and disposition. Though you can interchange the names, when he told me the joke Charles Stanley was President of the SBC.
I'll tell it about Paige Patterson, though Al Mohler is a good target as well.
Heard Paige and Dot went out to walk their duck the other day at a lake near the Seminary and they got their head all cut up by an outboard motor.
And Tony:
You're one of the good guys and I did appreciate this blog on Frank Norris.
With Dave on whose blog I left a note, I am looking forward to your upcoming article on the Indy Baps.
Cormac McCarthy is not that far afield unless you call Time Mag a home for esoterics. The recent conversation in Time between Cormac and the Coen Brothers is quite worthwhile, even good for the masses.
Peace
Sfox
And the Museum of Crime and Museum of God is frought with references and allusions to Billy Sunday and River Baptism, at the heart of our common Baptist experience of Revivalism and other enthusiasms.
I think you will find it most interesting when you can make the time; you two, Dave.
Mark - I am not an Alliance Baptist, don't know what they believe about much of anything. And yes, I mean the sin of gluttony when I said about obesity, I can see you are a true literalist, and I would not win any debate with you.
Just suffice it to say, I was saved by a God of Grace and Compassion. I am an alcoholic, was drinking a quart a day of vodka for 20 years. There were people of love that came to me talking about a God that loved me no matter what, and I found that hard to believe. I let them take me to dinner in their homes where they talked about family things I knew nothing about, loving, caring, trusting. Who does that? Then they offered to take me to AA meetings, why?! Who were these people, what did they want, and what would they get out of it!?? All I had heard most of those 20 years of drinking was that I was going to hell. I knew that, I was even trying to hurry it along, I didn't care.
All that was 30 years ago this past Oct 10th. So that is why I believe in a God of Love, not one who yells that I am going to hell.
Paul
Post a Comment