In thinking through my options for a post today, I was intrigued by a continuing spate of articles relative to neuro-science. My last post cited research showing that the brain's pleasure center can influence it's taste center, explaining why we sometimes judge something to be better because we expect it to be better -- a more expensive bottle of wine, for example.
I've also run across an article claiming that a German researcher using functional MRI scans can "read minds," predicting with 78 percent accuracy whether a test subject is thinking of a hammer or a pair of pliers -- assuming that he has captured brain scans when the same subject was previously thinking about those particular tools. He thinks the ability to predict what someone is thinking will only get better.
And, I was particularly intrigued by a Time magazine article on the brain and belief. Sam Harris, a neuro-scientist better known for his antipathy toward religion, joined other researchers who also used functional MRI scans to observe brain activity while persons were faced with a series of propositions that they believed to be either true or false. While activity in the "higher" levels of the brain was ambiguous, the scientists discovered that when subjects believed something to be true, a primitive area of the brain associated with things like reward, emotion, and taste "lit up" on the scan.
When subjects disbelieved something, however, whether it was a false math statement like "2+2=5" or an abhorrent ethical proposition like "torture is good," brain scans showed higher activity in another primitive part of the brain, one that is also associated with taste, but more closely related to pain perception and disgust -- the same area that lights up when we're confronted with a foul odor that stinks so bad it makes us want to heave.
At our house, on January 18 our brains are largely occupied with remembering. It is an anniversary day for us; not of our wedding day or any other happy day, but of the day our daughter Bethany's brain stopped working after her skull was crushed by a drunk driver.
That, of course, has a lot to do with my own brain lights up with distaste relative to the subject of alcohol, no doubt fueling my personal aversion to its use as a recreational drug. For those who take offense at my occasional rants against booze, you can blame it on my brain.
On a higher level of thinking, I can understand the concept of drinking alcohol in moderation and for reasons other than getting wasted. And, though the very thought induces my gag reflex, I can appreciate the idea that some people truly think that wine, beer, and even hard liquor tastes good. The primitive part of my brain, however, doesn't think in such categories. It remembers only the pain and loss and disgust associated with knowing our daughter died because an otherwise promising young man had become a slave to beer: and that stinks.
Friday, January 18, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

6 comments:
It is in times like these, when I read word such as the ones you have penned here, that I wish I could be your friend and help bear some of this annual burden of yours. The grieving never ends, I know, and the dull ache sometimes isn't dull. My prayers go with you.
Thanks, friend.
Like you, and perhaps your family members, far too many others have experienced,and will continue to experience, the unspeakable heartache and pain from the loss of loved ones at the hands of intoxicated motorists, who've been licensed by an overly permissive society. And who will comfort the pain-scarred families left behind by these otherwise, already brain-dead, motorists?
Although I can only imagine how difficult it must be for you to carry such deep pain; still, I thank God for your annual reminder of the senseless tragedy that claimed Bethany's precious young life. Moreover, I thank God for the reminder that his Holy Spirit always comforts us in our afflictions, especially in the midst of our pain and heartache.
As for the gist of your blog regarding scientific studies of the human brain, I am concerned about the future ramifications of such studies. For instance, I can imagine such studies being used one day in a court of law to aquit someone of committing a horrible crime on the grounds that a primitive part of their brain that helps them make choices between good and evil are underdeveloped or non-existent; meaning such a person cannot be held responsible for their actions. After all, God made them that way; so if you're going to blame anyone, blame God.
If, in fact, such studies were ever used to excuse criminal or even unethical behavior, then God would indeed be "dead," and every man would become, "a law unto himself."
Who would ever want to live in such a world?
Trinity
Thanks for the kind words, Trinity, and for the interesting thought that brain science might be used as a criminal defense. Currently, at least, I think an insanity defense is generally based on a psychiatrist's diagnosis, but I suppose it's possible that fMRI data could eventually find its way to the courtroom.
My maternal grandmother was killed in a car/train accident as she rushed to my side one fall afternoon when the pears were ripe and the sun warm.
The locomotive engineer was sober, as was she, and that does nothing to numb the pain.
It still returns each year, certainly not like the memory of the loss of a child, but like the memory of the catastrophic loss of a parent.
That was in September and I was a teenager not ready to give up the woman who was more my mother in many ways than was her daughter.
Although I have learned to celebrate her life, the grief abides, and each year I seek again to make a more lasting peace with it.
In that spirit with those memories, I pray for you.
While I have never had a family member killed by an impaired driver, I have witnessed first hand the devestation that can be caused by those who completely disregard human life in favor of their own selfish wants/needs. In serving the dual roles of firefighter/first responder and trauma chaplain, I have held the hands of the dying, comforted those who are wondering if they are going to die, and I have made the hard phone calls and visits in the middle of the night to break unspeakable news.
My low and high point of ministry came when I walked out of the Trauma Room at Scotland Memorial Hospital one afternoon after watching a doctor pronounce a beautiful two year old child dead from trauma associated with abuse. My words to the deputy as I angrily left that ER was "you guys make sure he (the killer) lives in hell until God can get him there."
I was shocked at my words, honest as they were for the emotions I was feeling at the time. I was a pastor. I preach forgiveness. I ask for forgivness. Yet here I was, denying it to this boy's murderer.
Over the next several weeks I played that scene over and over in my mind and wrestled with my feelings and thoughts. Finally, God helped me to understand that my job is to minister to everyone, those who I love and those I find harder to love. Christ forgives me unconditionally and I am required to do the same. God has called me to minister, not to judge.
That doesn't make it any easier to watch people die, it doesn't take away the pain, and it doesn't make me forget. But it does allow me to focus on ministering to all who are hurting. I've found that those who have hurt or killed someone at times need me even more than the family of those who have been victims.
Like Dr. Cartledge, I too have developed a hatred for what drugs and alcohol can do to a person's life. I cannot imagine being a family member and trying to find a way to forgive. Dr. Cartledge and his family set a wonderful example for all of us to follow in this area. I thank God for them.
Post a Comment