A new study from LifeWay Christian Resources notes that the percentage of younger adults attending the Southern Baptist Convention's annual meeting has declined significantly for the past 27 years, with an even steeper drop since 2004.
The study found that messengers in the 18-39 age group comprised 33.6 percent of the messengers in 1980, but made up only 13.1 percent in 2007.
The numbers were reversed for the oldest age group: the percentage of messengers aged 60 and above increased from 12.9 to 35.4 percent during the same period.
Little change was seen in the middle group: messengers aged 40-59 made up 49.9 percent in 1980, compared to 51.6 percent in 2007.
LifeWay's research director Ed Stetzer observed: "Simply put, the proportion of those under 40 attending the SBC is declining precipitously –- down by more than 50 percent since the beginning of the Conservative Resurgence."
Note that Ed made the "Conservative Resurgence" connection, not me. He went on to note that some folks have debated whether the decline in participation by younger people is real. With evidence in hand, he concluded, "My hope is that now, finally, we will stop debating and instead ask the hard question: 'What is causing so many young leaders to stay away?'"
I can't speak for others, but I can recall why I attended the SBC when I was younger. I fit into the 18-39 age group from 1970 to 1991. I drove to my first convention (Miami) in 1975, and missed only a couple during the remainder of my "young pastor" years, even though finances were tight. In 1981, the Tabbs Creek church in Oxford took a special offering to help me get to Los Angeles, where I ate mostly crackers. In 1984, Jan and I slept in our car to avoid spending money on a hotel while driving to Kansas City. It was a struggle, but I thought it was important to attend.
Why?
In the earliest years, at least, I made the effort to attend because:
1. I loved the SBC, wanted to support it, and believed it was relevant.
2. I admired the statesmen who led the SBC executive committee and its agencies, and wanted to learn from them.
3. I thought it mattered.
To the extent that the above statements remain true for younger Baptists, I believe they'll come to the meetings. If not, they'll put their time, energy, and travel money into something they believe is more relevant.
With their 61 percent drop in attendance, it appears to me that younger Baptists are sending a clear message. Whether anyone beyond LifeWay will pay attention to it remains an open question.
Wednesday, January 9, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

3 comments:
Dr. Cartledge,
As a SBC Youth Leader... Id say the reason that my kids have no desire to attend the Convention meetings is because they simply cannot find their place in the SBC right now. Lifeway's Sunday School lit. that is delivered each quarter to our church seems to be less and less challenging with each passing day. I believe that the youth of today are looking at their future in the SBC and seeing it very bleak- even those raised in the SBC from birth. I have been in the SBC since I began my church life and while at first I would have called myself 'loyal' to the convention. that has really changed as I have come to understand a little better the views of the Convention. (Exp. some of the new ones exp. in the 2000 BFM. I dont know what the future holds for today's youth in the SBC.. but I do believe that something has to change for the kids I work with to want to stay in as the time plays out.
In Christ,
L.P.
Dr. Cartledge,
Which SBC church are we talking about here? Contemporary or traditional? CP giving side-by-side with CBF? The one that cares about Lottie Moon or the one that doesn't have a clue what that is all about? What about the old SBC church that still calls itself SBC but adheres to BFM '63? Or perhaps we are talking about the SBC church that refuses to acknowledge the forgiveness of sin and has no place divorced and remarried pastors or deacons? With young adults living in a season of their lives when they are seeking after an understanding of who they are, I fail to understand why the SBC is scratching their heads on this one.
Could it be that the drastic drop in the percentage of young adults attending the SBC is connected to a broader trend reported by Barna (and blogged by Cartledge) about three months ago? According to a survey young people, ages 16-29, overwhelmingly "describe modern-day Christianity as judgmental, hypocritical and anti-gay." According to David Kinnaman, Barna Group president, "The anti-homosexual perception has now become sort of the Geiger counter of Christians' ability to love and work with people." He says, "The Christian community's ability to take the high road and help to deal with some of the challenges that this (anti-gay) perception represents may be the ... defining response of the Christian church in the next decade." Maybe more young don't think the SBC matters for some of the reasons cited in Barna's recent study.
You can read about the Barna survey at http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2007-10-10-christians-young_N.htm.
Post a Comment