In an e-mail blast to supporters, Wildmon claims "If the liberals win the upcoming election, America as we have known it will no longer exist." Rather, the nation "founded on Judeo-Christian values" will be "replaced by a secular state hostile to Christianity."As if that overblown specter is not enough, Wildmon asserts that a "liberal" victory would mean "This 'city on a hill,' which our forefathers founded, will go dark," creating permanent damage that can never be repaired.
After reading that, I noticed a distinctive odor and checked my shoes, even though there's not a bull left within miles of my house.
Wildmon's shrill nattering has to appear as complete and utter nonsense to anyone who doesn't share his delusion that America under the current administration is a model "city on a hill." America has never been perfect or loved by all, but there was a time when America was the world's most respected nation and a model of values respecting human rights and national sovereignty. In a deeply divisive eight years, the "Christian values" Bush administration has squandered America's value capital and surrendered the moral high ground the nation had enjoyed for many years. Huge portions of the world now see America as a nation that invades, that tortures, that imprisons without charges or trials, that cares only for its own interests and torpedoes the global economy with its undisciplined profligacy. If we are to regain our place of respect in the world, our crying need is for a truly moral and intelligent president who understands the value of diplomacy and the priority of respecting human rights and others' beliefs.
Single-issue readers may respond that anyone who supports abortion rights or gay rights cannot claim to be Christian, just, or concerned with human rights. Such matters are important and must be a part of our national discussion, but all morality cannot be defined on the basis of one or two issues.
Is there clear evidence that John McCain would be a strong Christian leader? Other than a tired story about his Vietnamese prison guard drawing a cross in the dirt one Christmas, I've heard McCain say little about his personal faith. He wallows in riches that were -- and continue to be -- made of profits from a family beer distributorship led by his wife, whom he dated while his first wife lay gravely injured. I wonder how many children and adults have died and will die from the drunken drivers whose beer purchases could be traced directly to the family business? How many homes will be ruined by alcoholism fueled by beer sales that fatten the family purse? Is this a moral icon?
It's not my place to judge the sincerity of John McCain's faith, of course. Likewise, it's not Don Wildmon's place to make unsubstantiated, fear-mongering claims that Barack Obama -- a professing Christian who talks easily and often about his faith -- would transform America into a secular nation that is hostile to Christianity.
As it is, such frantic alarms reveal more about the would-be prophet's narrowness of vision than the clarity of his perception.
Calm down, Chicken Little: the sky is not falling.
[Image from disney-clipart.com]

12 comments:
I get so tired of hearing how we are a "Christian nation" founded on "Christian principles." Given the deistic propensities of many of our founding fathers, it would be laughable if it weren't so sad that so many people believe that line.
As for the GOP, Barry Goldwater, rest his soul, predicted the demise of the party if and when the religious right should get hold of it. Two examples come to mind...
--Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they're sure trying to do so, it's going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can't and won't compromise. I know, I've tried to deal with them.
--November 1994
--When you say "radical right" today, I think of these moneymaking ventures by fellows like Pat Robertson and others who are trying to take the Republican Party away from the Republican Party, and make a religious organization out of it. If that ever happens, kiss politics goodbye.
--The Washington Post (28 July 1994)
Oddly enough, McCain succeeded Goldwater in the Senate seat he now holds.
Anyway, while I'm certainly no fan of Obama, it's obvious that the Republicans are as clueless as they accuse Democrats of being. *shaking head*
Jr, I am truly sorry you are tired of hearing about our Christian principles. If you would rather live elsewhere, don't let the door hit you in the rear on your way out.
star
Regardless of the ridiculous historically ignorant “sky is falling” rhetoric of the Religious Right”, at least it is more concerned with our nation than in what the rest of the world thinks about us. Where do people from all over the world go to seek freedom and opportunity? Well, they do not go to Russia or Europe or China. As far as the Christian faith of McCain or Obama goes – it really does not matter about the religious views of either candidate. McCain can be a Baptist with ties to beer distribution and Obama can be a long time member of a bigoted, hate-filled church. (I wonder how many of Obama's fellow church members have hurt the cause of Christ by following Wright's lead and substituting hate for the gospel.) All that really matters is which political philosophy is best for the country. There is a great need for young people to learn the history of our nation, which, I hope, will guide them to make wise decisions. By the way, I am proud of my students. Most are really excited about voting and many are voting for the first time. One student confessed to me that she learned a valuable lesson when she voted last week – she saw that there were so many other people and issues to vote for and she was not well informed. She only wanted to vote for president!!! I told her that she can cast a more educated vote in two years.
LOL...perhaps I should clarify...
Some of the founding fathers were Christians (largely Anglican/Episcopal but some other denominations as well). Many were not (but were deists instead of atheists or agnostics). The principles of liberty they espoused were, they believed, were part of human nature, twisted by the despotism of the English crown and other monarchies.
Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness (including possession of property), they believed, are natural rights given to humankind and one need not be a Christian to either understand or acknowledge those rights.
What Christians have done (or tried to do) is similar to what happens in many Muslim countries where moral law is transposed onto civil law. Morality can't be legislated (and both the right and left are promising to do that).
So long as a free church exists in a free state, the truth of the good news will be free to flourish and grow out in the open. If that freedom is diminished, the church will be forced underground (where it will still grow). In my mind, this election (as others) is about freedom. Without freedom, all those debates won't be allowed to happen. Preserving freedom is the starting point for even discussing the other issues.
I'm not tired of hearing about Christian principles. :-)
starduster, I don't think jr tired of Christian principles. I think he, like many others, just longs to see those principles lived out; not just talked out. My name is Mike and I approve this message :)
jr.....right on the mark about a free church in a free state!! By the time Jefferson became president, the process of disestablishing state churches had produced a flourishing Christian culture. The Federalists framers of the Constitution saw the wisdom of prohibiting religious tests for offices and necessity of accepting amendments based on the requests of Antifederalists. Most pertinent to this discussion, of course, is the establishment clause of the First Amendment. Thus, we have a secular federal government in which religious freedom was guaranteed and Christianity flourished.
About morality - it can be legislated. We do it all the time and in many ways. For example, We have made it illegal to lie in court. The flourishing Christianity heavily influenced the morality of our nation. Many elections are about choosing the views of one group over the views of another. Does that make us a Christian nation? No, but it is democracy at work - sometimes ugly, but much preferred over any other form of government.
While I agree with your premise, there is one phrase that concerns me.
"In a deeply divisive eight years, the "Christian values" Bush administration has squandered America's value capital and surrendered the moral high ground the nation had enjoyed for many years."
Are you kidding me? What about the Clinton shenangins?
My point is that this nation surrendered its moral authority a long time ago.
I think I'll let mike be my spokesperson. LOL Well put, friend.
Stephen, good point about making it illegal to lie in court. Maybe it would be better to say that *personal* morality can't be legislated, in which case perjury is more an issue regarding the equitable operation of the government in light of the rule of law instead of a strictly moral issue. For example, perjury is a criminally punishable offense; lying, in general, is not criminal (although it's implications often play out in civil courts...not based on the immorality of lying, but on the damage it incurs on another).
--BTW, stephen, I'm a history instructor in training (taking history classes while I'm teaching religion) so this stuff has really been at the front of my brain lately in regards to the current election and it's implications.--
If digital mail boxes could bulge with variations on those "let me frighten you" emails, bulge they would.
You received a "Christian family" variant but there are emails which are intended to frighten a long list of other identifiable groups.
I think it is only when we haul these smelly things out into the light that we can all see them for what they are, and so not be manipulated as they intend.
Thank you for hauling ashore and dissecting one, so that we could all have more of the knowledge that makes us free.
jr.....I could tell by your posts that you were more than a "history buff" and I have enjoyed reading your thoughts even if I did not toally agree. BTW, I am a history professor.....ABD, working on my Ph.D. I will be teaching Religion in America next term...for the first time. I invite you to view my blog at http://ducksoup-stephen.blogspot.com/
I just found your blog and I totally agree. I have been receiving emails from a minister, which are some of the most slanderous lies passed about a national political candidate in many years. When I have pointed out documentation that id's them for what they are, he claims that I am lying, and that I need to be praying for "America" and myself now. I am convinced that much of what I am hearing and seeing is simply disguised racism. The fear is for a true African-American to become president. I know there are also the right wing wedge issues, but I believe that racism lies at the bottom of it all.
GMM, you could be right. But, don't they realize that Obama is half white? That makes him as much white as black. True, the racists don't need information, they just need a forum to spread their lies.
Jr, thanks for the clarification. I hated writing what I did, but you got my point and set me straight. Thanks for your thoughtful and gentle response, too!
star
Post a Comment