Friday, February 27, 2009

Need a project?

Some people like to build models that come in a box, while others prefer to start their projects from scratch. Some folks think spending a few hours on a model car or plane is more than enough, while others may invest days or weeks.

And then there's Alec Garrard, who has spent 30 years working on an elaborate model of the Jewish temple during the time of Jesus. The model, housed in a separate building outside his home in Norfolk, England, is 20 feet long and 12 feet wide, surrounded by walls painted to look like the hills surrounding Jerusalem. 

Garrard said he always liked building models and had wanted a project that would keep him busy for the rest of his life. He spent three years researching the famous edifice known as "Herod's Temple," and has since invested more than 33,000 hours working on it. He forms every brick and tile from clay, bakes them in an oven, paints them if necessary, and painstakingly fits them into his intensely realistic creation. No less than 4,000 carefully sculpted figures, each about one-half inch tall, populate the courts and corridors of the temple complex. 

Garrard's wife thinks he's mad, he told The Daily Mail.  "She wishes she'd married a normal person." After 30 years, he still devotes hours each day to the 1:100 scale model, and doubts he'll live long enough to finish because he keeps thinking of things to add.

That's the way it is with life, I suppose. We may not live as long as we want to or accomplish every goal we've set out for ourselves, but we keep plugging away until we can't plug any more. Then, believers hold, we'll be on track to visit a temple not made with hands, and to meet a Creator beyond imagining.

[These photos by Geoff Robinson from The Daily Mail, which features other photos, as well. Garrard has slide sets available for sale at this site, and has also published a book of photos called The Splendor of the Temple, available online.]

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Buy degrees ...

We occasionally run across an expression such as "growing by degrees" or even "learning by degrees." Lately, I've been getting e-mails from a scam outfit that urge me to "buy degrees." I suspect I'm not alone.

The email claims that college degrees are easy to buy, and expresses dismay that many students continue to "just sit around in their usually boring local University classes, wasting money."

It goes on to suggest that I might buy a degree by verifying my life or work experience and "get all the documents like the diploma certificate with the University's legal verification and official seal certifying the degree chosen, the transcript, a cover letter, copies of the College's or University's official certificate of accreditation, the institutions postal prospectus approval and a few important things more."

You will note that the sentence structure does not appear to be that of a college graduate, or of someone whose first language is English. Not only is the possessive form of "institution" missing its apostrophe, but the writer assures us that we will get its "postal prospectus approval."

Does anyone know what a college's "postal prospectus approval" is? Did you get one when you earned your degree the old, boring, money-wasting way?

Later, the e-mail even misspells the word "cheese" while admonishing me that my hard-earned legitimate education cost me "tons of cheeze." It doesn't take a college degree to tell when something smells, and I'm not talking about a hunk of Limburger.

Since "students" can get "the degree you want" by "verifying life experience," I wonder if some will choose Bachelor of Beer, Masters of Meandering, or Doctor of Dithering degrees. Pondering the possibilities could keep a virtual class going for hours.

We've long had diploma mills selling worthless paper to people who think it means something to buy a degree. Religious "schools" are some of the worst offenders, and often give "life experience" credit in exchange for a credit card number. I know of pastors who brazenly call themselves "Dr." when all they have is an "honorary" degree from a flimflam school that tries to gain credibility by showing up on the famous preacher's resume.

I love education earned in the traditional way, though I'm fully aware that some of our most educational experiences don't come from schools or award degrees that can hang on the wall.

Those who have real educations don't need the crutch of a degree that cost them nothing more than a phone call to a mysterious New York City number and a few hundred bucks.

Those who get suckered in to such a scam -- perhaps thinking a fake degree will help them get a job or improve their lives -- are bound to learn a hard lesson. Let's hope they find it worth the price -- or else get smart before they put the check in the mail.

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Belt-tightening time

News from the past week puts in written form what most of us know either instinctively or from personal experience -- the nation's economic malaise is directly impacting both church budgets and the ministries those budgets support.

Receipts are down in at least 57 percent of churches, according to the National Association of Church Business Administration, as reported by Rob Marus of Associated Baptist Press. The study appears to have been based on information gathered from churches large enough to have business administrators on staff, which may or may not skew the results. Anecdotal evidence I hear suggests that churches who aren't facing a downturn in contributions are the exception rather than the rule.

When church income goes down, contributions to causes supported by the church goes down, too. North Carolina is one of many state conventions to face significant budget shortfalls that have led to much pencil sharpening and revising of budgets. Several Southern Baptist seminaries, facing a loss of investment income, have announced significant reductions in spending.

This past week, the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship announced in a press release that income is running at seven percent below 2008 and at just 79 percent of its current budget. As a result, the organization is cutting internal spending by 20 percent, and reducing funding for partner organizations by 30 percent. Partner organizations include more than a dozen Baptist divinity schools and entities like Associated Baptist Press, EthicsDaily.com, and Baptists Today. All of those organizations depend on contributions for part of their budgets, and are now hard-pressed to make up the difference.

Similar stories abound, and I suspect we all are familiar with ministries that are struggling to make ends meet. It is a time for digging deeper, casting wider nets, and revisiting priorities. It is a difficult time, but if it drives us to redefine our core missions, a potentially a profitable time.

Successful dieters rejoice when they can tighten their belts and exercise longer. Perhaps some serious revisiting of vision and resources can lead churches and organizations to develop leaner, broader based, and more effective ministries.

We can hope.

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Living with stress

Living with stress, I'm convinced, is a good thing -- the only people who have no stress are dead.

Stress can be hard on you, and some types of stress are much harder than others. But, as a series of articles in the Feb. 23 Newsweek magazine illustrates, the downside is often overblown and the upside is under-appreciated.

Anything that makes your heart race causes stress, whether it's bad economic news, a romantic invitation, a long day's work, or a two-mile jog. Stress associated with tragedy can be overwhelming and requires special care, but stress associated with everyday life is, well, a part of everyday life.

Those who think life should be stress free and think of it as an unwelcome intrusion are more likely to consider themselves victimized and "stressed out," while those who regard stress as a natural part of life tend to handle their stress with greater facility.

Looking back, it's not hard to see how successful coping with stress in the past can prepare us for the stressors we face today. Two-a-day practices and the emotional see-saw of competing in high school football brought me a lot more stress than making good grades in physics or Latin, but the experience was an important cog in both my physical and psychological development.

The childhood heartbreaks we experience over broken toys and the adolescent wounds we receive from bumbling relationships help to prepare us for life as adults, when the stakes are higher and the wounds are deeper.

I was feeling a little stressed before a meeting last week with some friends who are pastors. After spending a few hours being reminded of what their daily life is like, my burdens seemed almost inconsequential.

Stress itself is not inherently negative -- it's when we dwell on our stressors and let them dominate our thinking that we empower stress to steal our joy. It's hard to surpass the advice of the master teacher, who said "So then, do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Today has enough trouble of its own" (Matt. 6:34, NET).

And today is where we live.

Monday, February 16, 2009

Good neighbors go the distance

I've been reflecting on the lengths to which some folks go to help others -- not because they get paid for it, or even because they get a big "thank you," but because they take Jesus' command to love their neighbors seriously.

And, because they realize that in today's world of near-instant communication and fast transportation, our neighbors aren't just the people next door, or even on the other side of town.

I continue to be grateful for the unselfish work of Baptist Men, whose disaster relief and recovery work remains a sterling example of what it means to put faith into action. I've had the opportunity to watch (and occasionally help) some of the most competent people I've ever met provide food, showers and laundry services in the wake of terrorist attacks and natural disasters from Manhattan to Gulfport and places in between. They've cleaned wells, removed debris and rebuilt homes from Choluteca to Galveston, from Seven Springs to Sri Lanka.

The current focus of activity is in Kentucky and northern Arkansas, an area hard hit by a massive ice storm Jan. 27. Coordinated nationally by the Red Cross and the North American Mission Board, chainsaw teams and feeding units from Baptist Men organizations across the south were mobilized quickly and volunteers streamed in to work long days for no pay other than the intrinsic rewards that come with self-giving.

And, they're still there. I'm most familiar with volunteers from North Carolina Baptist Men, who have been in Kentucky for weeks. According to disaster relief coordinator Gaylon Moss, as of Feb. 14, a total of 85 volunteers from N.C. had assisted 177 families in Stanford, and were also beginning new efforts in Livingston County, northeast of Paducah.

Like the Energizer Bunny, the men (and women) who serve through Baptist Men keep going and going. As long as we live on this earth, I suppose, there will be natural disasters. My prayer is that there will always be Baptist Men, as well.

Friday, February 13, 2009

I want to go to Iraq

Not today, or tomorrow.

Probably not for several years, and certainly not as a soldier -- but I want to go to Iraq.

I want to go as a tourist, a student, a pilgrim of sorts.

I want to see where Western civilization was born, where writing was invented, where ziggurats once reached for the sky.

I'd like to visit the ruins of Ur, where the Sumerians lived, where Abraham was born, where kings like Meskalamdug and Shulgi ruled. It's in the Basra region of southern Iraq.

I'd like to stand on what is left of the Etemenanki (left), a massive temple in Babylon. I show satellite images of it to my students to remind them what great builders the Babylonians were. I'd like to walk where Nebuchadnezzar walked, not far from modern-day Baghdad. I'd like to sit, like the Hebrew exiles, by the waters of Babylon, but without any cause for weeping.

I want to go to Nineveh, near the northern city of Mosul, in the heartland of what was once Assyria. I'd like to lay eyes on what is left of the great palace of Sennacherib and other evidence of the ancient land that plays such a large role in the Bible.

Most of all, I'd like to go in peace. I'd like to visit a land where people recognize the lunacy of self-triggered body bombs and the fringe fundamentalists who exploit terror for their own gain.

I don't know when that day will come, but I pray for its advent. There are recent signs of hope. The war seems to be winding down and the populace seems restive for peace. More specifically, officials have announced plans to reopen the Iraqi National Museum within the next month (though other officials disagree). The museum, which suffered unconscionable looting when U.S. troops invaded Baghdad in 2003, has recovered many of its priceless artifacts, and is supposed to be secured by a "relics protection force."

Iraqi officials have also expressed a desire to develop the ruins of Babylon as a tourist destination, according to a report on AlArabiyah.net. A temporary U.S. Army base on the site caused major damage to ancient pavements and walls, but the U.S. Embassy is reportedly spending $700,000 towards restoration efforts. It's not enough, I'm sure, but it's a start. The World Monuments Fund is also aiding the efforts, and if peace becomes a reality, others will pitch in.

When they're ready for tourists, I want to be one of them, and for once, I hope there's a crowd.

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

The next Baptist century

A news blog from Baptists Today:

GREENSBORO, N.C. – How can Baptists maintain an effective witness into their fifth century of existence? More than 400 participants gathered at First Baptist Church February 9 to mark the 400th anniversary of the Baptist movement and to anticipate what the fifth century of Baptist life might hold.

Sponsored by Cooperative Baptist Fellowship of North Carolina (CBFNC), the “Convocation for a New Baptist Century” drew guests and CBFNC ministry partners from across the state and as far away as Texas and Washington, D.C.

CBFNC coordinator Larry Hovis said that if Baptists in the next century are to be faithful, they must preserve and live by bedrock Baptist principles, pursue the mission of God, and work together in missional collaboration.

Hovis highlighted the traditional Baptist hallmarks of believing in the Lordship of Christ, trusting the Scriptures as authoritative, recognizing that every believer is a priest before God, appreciating the autonomy of the local church, promoting religious liberty, and intentionally cooperating with others.

In pursuing the mission of God, Cooperative Baptists must recognize their need for one another, Hovis said, and “provide an authentic Baptist community where we can celebrate our oneness and respect our differences.”

Past programs of cooperation among Baptists have focused on funding from the churches and governance of funded institutions by the denomination, Hovis said. He pledged that CBFNC, in contrast, will facilitate mutual collaboration based on conversations between representatives of the churches, the supported ministries, and CBFNC leadership.

Entering the new century, he said, CBFNC is ready to serve as a “robust catalyst” to assist collaborative partners “as we pursue God’s mission together.”

Earlier in the day, Baptist historian Bill Leonard, dean of the Wake Forest University Divinity School, presented a paper addressing “The New Baptist Century in Historical Context,” and responded to questions in a time of lively discussion.

In a closing message, Mike Queen, pastor of First Baptist Church in Wilmington, said Baptists are “tribal people.” Christians have divided themselves into many tribes, he said, and Baptists have developed tribes of their own, but “that’s how it’s always been in the Kingdom of God.

Queen noted how Moses instructed the Israelites to encamp by tribes surrounding the tabernacle, each flying its distinctive banner. Thus, “both unity and uniqueness were celebrated” in the peoples’ “corporate identity as children of Israel and particular identity as members of their tribes.”

As a former president of the Baptist State Convention of North Carolina (BSCNC) General Board, Queen was a tireless advocate for unity within the BSCNC during the 1990s, an effort that ultimately ran aground in the rising conservative tide that now dominates the state convention. During the same period, CBFNC emerged as an alternative nexus of cooperation and fellowship for those who felt disenchanted with or disenfranchised by the BSCNC.

“I spent a long time chasing the wrong things in Baptist life the past 25 years,” Queen told the congregation. “CBF of North Carolina is my tribe in the Baptist nation,” he said, “but it is not a denomination to be won: it’s all about mission and freedom.”

“It’s exciting to be a part of something that is still new and filled with hope we can scarcely imagine,” Queen said. That hope can be found in Jesus alone and calls for vigilant focus, he said, for “When you fall in love with an institution, you may lose the ability to follow Jesus.”

“The easy part of our faith is to believe,” Queen concluded. “The following part gets hard: that’s where we need one another.”

In a key component of the convocation, representatives from 23 organizations recognized as CBFNC ministry partners joined CBFNC leaders and the congregation in a litany of common mission and mutual support.

A choir composed of students from North Carolina Baptist colleges led participants in worship, concluding with a rousing choral benediction that brought participants to their feet.

Sunday, February 8, 2009

What would you do with $60,000?

A FoxNews.com report tells us that Randall Price, director of the "Center for Judaic Studies" at Liberty University in Lynchburg, Va., is trying to raise $60,000 so he can uncover Noah's ark atop Mt. Ararat.

Charging high fees to fundamentalist Christians who want to prove the Bible by finding Noah's ark is a lucrative business for bureaucrats in Turkey. Price says he is following up on a lead from a shepherd who claims he remembers playing on the ark as a boy. Supposedly, he led Price to the spot -- at 15,000 feet -- last September, where they expected to find the ark buried in a glacier, but discovered nothing more than a 60-foot-deep pile of boulders. The article says that "Price believes the landslide may have resulted from attacks against Kurdish rebels on the mountain, or perhaps from explosives that were set off to cover up the ark."

There's always an excuse, a theory, a speculation -- but never an ark. One of Price's predecessors, retired pilot Richard Bright, says he has made 30 trips to Turkey in search of the ark. There are always tips, but never so much as a peg made of gopher wood: just enough to keep the wealthy Westerners coming back.

Of course, the late pseudo-archaeologist Ron Wyatt, a retired medical doctor, claimed to have found the ark years ago and published pictures of it on his website, which is more akin to supermarket tabloids touting an alien invasion than to archaeology. Wyatt also claimed to have found brimstone from Sodom and Gomorrah, Egyptian chariot wheels from the Red Sea, and the Ark of the Covenant, among other things.

But back to Price and his effort to raise $60,000 to pay off Turkish officials, buy earth-moving and ice-melting equipment, and somehow transport it to the top of Mt. Ararat: he believes the project is worthwhile because making a discovery would
"mean so much to so many, many people worldwide."

It seems to me that if God had wanted us to prove ancient Bible stories true (thus eliminating the need for faith), the ark would have been miraculously preserved and left in plain view, rather than hidden beneath inconvenient rubble in the wide variety of places aging shepherds claim to have remembered seeing it.

I can think of many ways $60,000 could "mean so much to so many" in this world. Spending it on yet another expedition to Mt. Ararat is so far down the list that I'd have to move 60 feet of rock and melt a glacier to find it.


[The photo of Mt. Ararat is my own, taken from the Armenian side of the border with Turkey. "Big Ararat" is to the right, and "Little Ararat" to the left.]

Friday, February 6, 2009

The pill: boon or bane?

Was the invention of the birth control pill a good thing or a bad thing? Most people, I suspect, have never considered the options.

In a world of limited resources that continues to be threatened by overpopulation, there are good arguments for seeing the invention of the pill as a boon to humankind: the earth's population stood at about three billion in 1960, but had doubled to six billion by 2000. By 2010, estimates suggest the population will reach about 9.2 billion. Many parts of the world already face severe food and resource shortages, fueling massive immigrations that leave other nations feeling threatened.

In an opinion piece in the Austrian newspaper Der Standard, Carl Djerassi, a chemist who contributed to the formulation of synthetic hormones used in the birth control pill, complained that a declining population has led to a demographic catastrophe in Austria, an "impossible situation" in which there aren't enough working people to support the retired people. Baptist Press picked up the story Feb. 5, asserting that Djerassi had connected the advent of the pill to Austria's population decline and was "lamenting the way the pill has been used."

Djarassi didn't draw a straight line between the pill and the problem, however, and later wrote a second column in which he spoke of other issues contributing to Austrian couples' trend to having fewer children. As explained in this corrective column in The Guardian posted Jan. 26, Djerassi's opinion piece made no explicit mention of contraception in general or the pill in particular: Catholic Cardinal Christoph Schönborn cited Djerassi's article as ammunition in lambasting the use of contraception, and confusion ensued (German readers can find the original article and the later effort to correct misperceptions by searching for "Carl Djerassi" on the Der Standard website).

But back to the point initially raised: what about Djerassi's expressed concern about the declining population in his home country? Europe as a whole has been in a population decline for some time, with the birthrate dropping as low as 1.3 in some countries (2.1 is considered ideal for sustaining the same population).

In a much more comprehensive analysis of the issue written for the New York Times Magazine, Russell Shorto points to a number of factors for the decline: the pill isn't one of them, though its availability certainly contributes to families having more options in family planning.

While the Catholic church continues to oppose artificial birth control and some conservative Protestants such as Albert Mohler of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary have openly decried deliberate childlessness as a sin, some of the most socially conservative countries -- such as Italy -- have the lowest birthrates.

Shorto points to a variety of other factors impacting the decision to have more or fewer babies. He points, for example, to one statistic that seems counter-intuitive: in Europe, women who are part of the work force tend to have more babies than those who stay at home. A part of the equation, it seems, has to do with social customs and a husband's willingness to contribute: women who have to do all the childcare and housework are less likely to want multiple children. Another factor is the timing of births. The longer young adults remain in their parents' home (a powerful contraceptive) and the older they are when the first child is born, the less likely they are to have additional children.

Shorto points out that European countries with the healthiest birthrates are Scandinavian countries in which the government provides financial and social support for families. Across the Atlantic, America maintains a healthy 2.1 birthrate while providing few economic incentives beyond an annual per-child tax credit, but generally offering greater flexibility for women to re-enter the job market. Arnstein Aassve, a Norwegian researcher working in Italy, told Shorto “You might say that in order to promote fertility, your society needs to be generous or flexible. The U.S. isn’t very generous, but it is flexible. Italy is not generous in terms of social services and it’s not flexible. There is also a social stigma in countries like Italy, where it is seen as less socially accepted for women with children to work. In the U.S., that is very accepted.”

Such arguments mean little to social conservatives who dislike the empowerment of women that comes with the availability of contraception, or those who argue (as Mohler does) that some versions of the pill actually constitute early abortion rather than contraception because they prevent fertilized eggs from becoming attached to the lining of the uterus.

Some who complain about lower birth rates, I'm convinced, are not as concerned about fewer babies being born, as they are about fewer white babies being born. And, the problem of there being too few people of working age to support the elderly is not a factor of population decline alone -- health advances that add decades to our lifespans and trends toward early retirements (especially in Europe) compound that problem considerably.

The birth control pill, in itself, has no moral component. Like an automobile, a kitchen knife, or most any scientific or technological development, it can be used in positive or negative ways. The world is in no danger of running out of people, and global overpopulation that overwhelms the world's resources remains a present threat. Societies that, for whatever reason, shrink beyond sustainability may simply have to develop measured immigration policies that provide employment opportunities for people from underdeveloped nations, who in turn can pay the taxes necessary to support the aging but indigenous population.

I'm neither a social scientist nor an economist, and I recognize that there are unlikely to be any simplistic or universal answers to issues of population diversity.

What I do believe is that there's more to having babies than maintaining population levels for either ethnic groups or countries. Whatever their social, cultural, or political situation, babies should be wanted -- and their parents should be able to care for them.

[Graph from the U.S. Census Bureau]

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Yard ornament with a past

She inherited the old stone jar from an aunt and didn't know what else to do with it, so she put it in the yard as a garden ornament. After 20 years, however, she decided to clean it up and have it appraised.

It turns out that the unidentified woman, from the English town of Dorset, had been decorating her garden with a 3,000-year-old relic, a ceremonial container designed to hold a deceased Egyptian's liver.

When Egyptians of sufficient means were mummified, ancient undertakers would remove various internal organs and pack them in natron to dry them out. When dry, the organs would be put into one of four canopic jars, which would be stored in a chest near the mummified body. Typically, each jar was topped by the image of an Egyptian god with a flair for protecting the particular organs inside.

The English woman's jar, which was dated between 1150 and 1069 B.C., has the image of human-faced Imseti on top, suggesting that it was designed to hold someone's liver. The woman seemed relieved that she'd kept it in the garden rather than the kitchen: "It's not the sort of thing you want to keep flour in."

If you're in the market for a liver jar, it goes on sale Feb. 5 at Duke's auction house in Dorchester.

[Story and photo from 24dash.com]

Sunday, February 1, 2009

Don't copy! (copied)

What's the easiest way for a university to come up with a good written policy on plagiarism?

You plagiarize someone else's statement.

Hard to believe, but true.

I first saw the story in the online Chronicle of Higher Education last Thursday, but it's not available without a subscription, so I couldn't pass it along. Fortunately, USA Today picked up the story the next day.

Apparently, someone on a committee devising a plagiarism policy for Southern Illinois University decided to take the easy way out -- and put forward substantial sections of a policy used by Indiana University. The only difference between the two is that SIU's definition of plagiarism takes a list of five numbered points from IU's policy and puts them in paragraph form.

Members of the committee said they couldn't explain the close similarity and suspected it must be the result of coincidence. The chair, however, said the committee would investigate and give credit where credit is due if it found dependence.

SIU has had unfortunate encounters with plagiarism before. In 2006, the chancellor of SIU's Carbondale campus (there's another in Edwardsville) was forced to resign after it was discovered that he'd plagiarized from himself -- lifting chunks of a new strategic plan from a similar plan he'd written for another school. The following year, it was discovered that the system's president had used large sections of unattributed material in his Ph.D. dissertation: they were deemed to be copying "errors and mistakes" rather than plagiarism.

I'd like to believe that the problems at SIU resulted from individual errors rather than reflecting something systemic. The problems certainly shouldn't reflect poorly on other educators who had nothing to do with it.

Unfortunately, they do. The splatter pattern from an egg in the face affects more than the eggee -- and it doesn't come off easily.